Search found 23 matches

by davey_r
14 Aug 2010, 14:17
Forum: Reference Section
Topic: The Buster Index
Replies: 6
Views: 4035

Re: The Buster Index

Yes, that's the cover. I got the book from Book Palace and it appears to be in brand new, unused condition. I had assumed it was new old stock left over from the original run, though from what Ray says perhaps new copies are still being made. Anyway, as I say the pages are all back to front and seve...
by davey_r
13 Aug 2010, 19:54
Forum: Reference Section
Topic: The Buster Index
Replies: 6
Views: 4035

The Buster Index

Finally got round to getting a copy of the Buster Index by Steve Holland / Ray Moore, which has proved to be excellent so well done to them. One random point though - the pages seemed to be bound back to front. Ray's article on the History of Buster starts on the last page of the book, and you then ...
by davey_r
28 Jun 2008, 14:53
Forum: Retired DCT titles
Topic: the Beezer 1973
Replies: 22
Views: 10782

Re: the Beezer 1973

Well, my Topper Tales arrived today, and I must say it's excellent. I can only imagaine the amount of research that goes into something like this. Fantastic job Kashgar, I know it's going to prove invaluable - thanks for writing it! As for Book Palace, I ordered the book yesterday afternoon and it c...
by davey_r
28 Jun 2008, 01:12
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: Are we dumbing down comics for today's kids?
Replies: 47
Views: 8377

Re: Are we dumbing down comics for today's kids?

Talking of not-quite-swearing, there was a Joker strip in Buster once which featured a bag of manure with the partially obscured label HORSE SH
I always thought that was a bit off..
by davey_r
25 Jun 2008, 15:31
Forum: Retired DCT titles
Topic: the Beezer 1973
Replies: 22
Views: 10782

Re: the Beezer 1973

That's exactly what I'm after.. will definitely have to pick up the Beezer and Topper volumes. I see bookpalace.com has the Topper, Dandy and Beano volumes.. so might go there unless you know of a better vendor? (I assume you don't sell them directly or anything?) As for the Book of Beezer I guess w...
by davey_r
24 Jun 2008, 19:17
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press
Replies: 26
Views: 4246

Re: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press

Yeah sorry I was somewhat lumping Classics From The Comics and the annual reprints together when they're actually quite seperate cases.. rambling a bit probably. Hmm, if there's so little interest in the really old comics, I wonder if Aurum will keep doing these reprint annuals, or if last year's Oo...
by davey_r
24 Jun 2008, 17:41
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press
Replies: 26
Views: 4246

Re: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press

Of course, all these comics were written, drawn and published with the sole intention of being bought by/for and read by children. But although it's the exact same comics being published again, they're being published for a different intended audience than they were last time round. The original com...
by davey_r
24 Jun 2008, 15:23
Forum: Retired DCT titles
Topic: the Beezer 1973
Replies: 22
Views: 10782

Re: the Beezer 1973

According to my trusty copy of Kashgar's invaluable (and sadly out of print) Book of Beezer ... Would I take it this is some sort of guidebook with info on strips, dates, etc? That's something that would be very interesting to me.. Does it ever crop up on ebay or such?? Would you be able to give me...
by davey_r
24 Jun 2008, 15:12
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press
Replies: 26
Views: 4246

Re: will there be any more dandy/beano reprints from aurum press

I hope they will do some more reprints.. As for the racist content, I'd've thought thought it was pretty clear the books are intended to be adult collectibles. No kid today is going to go into a bookshop and pick up a black and white "1940 Annual".. (in fact no kid today is going to go into a booksh...
by davey_r
31 Oct 2006, 02:43
Forum: Dandy
Topic: 1939 Dandy Book in shops now!
Replies: 5
Views: 3957

1939 Dandy Book in shops now!

Hmm, why do the Broons and the Dandy facsimile both say "1939 Annual" on the sleeve, when the Dandy one was published in 1938 for 1939 and the Broons one was published in 1939 for 1940? They seem to have used the year published dating system for the Broons and the year-published-for system for the D...
by davey_r
31 Oct 2006, 00:36
Forum: Retired DCT titles
Topic: Does the Beezer deserve more recognition?
Replies: 7
Views: 4054

Does the Beezer deserve more recognition?

It would be nice if the Beezer and Topper annuals were still going at least... even if it was alternating years...
by davey_r
31 Oct 2006, 00:34
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: DC Thomson Annuals
Replies: 14
Views: 4450

DC Thomson Annuals

Ah, there's one I missed, The Magic Fun Book, 1941-1942, before it got incorporated into the Beano book...
by davey_r
30 Oct 2006, 23:04
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: DC Thomson Annuals
Replies: 14
Views: 4450

DC Thomson Annuals

Thanks for the tips, I believe Cheeky and Cor are Fleetway/IPC though?? Anyway, I've already used the site's annuals section in compiling my list, and I think my list is complete, but there's the possibility that I've ignored a title listed on the site because I didn't realise it was DC Thomson (the...
by davey_r
30 Oct 2006, 13:41
Forum: Retired DCT titles
Topic: Why Topper is so sadly missed
Replies: 5
Views: 3649

Why Topper is so sadly missed

Having said that, I've just seen some of Dandy's latest of Beryl, and it seems to have gone back to more of a hyperactive, chaotic character. Still sort of misses the point of the original though..
by davey_r
30 Oct 2006, 13:38
Forum: General comics discussion
Topic: DC Thomson Annuals
Replies: 14
Views: 4450

DC Thomson Annuals

I mean comics that are humour/adventure in one comic, like dandy etc, as opposed to entirely adventure. Sorry, I didn't make that very clear, I should've just said humour. *edits post again*