Wow... 13 replies before I even bothered to check, and 15 by the time I got around to posting! I guess I'm just not used to high-traffic forums... or even medium-traffic forums.
Classic Comics wrote:DandyEd wrote:All the Bob Nixon artwork I have seen was submitted in line only, then coloured in-house.
Same here. Bob's comic strips were all sent in black and white. I think he did one or two pieces for posters or promotion in colour but pretty much everything else was in black and white. Bob drew very quickly and the board he found best for that was a very glossy stock, which wouldn't have taken colour.
I stand corrected. I wrote that post in a hurry, and formed an on-the-spot opinion of Nixon's preferred creative process after five seconds spent looking at the following:
- From Beano #3051 (Jan 6 2001), 'cos it was convenient
While I'm no expert in these matters, that looks like inks to me. Of course, I suppose there's no rule which says DC Thomson's in-house colourists aren't allowed to hand-colour their comics. They must have done something before Photoshop!
(Although this raises the interesting question: if Nixon's paper didn't take colour, what did DC Thomson colour on? Did he scan and email it, and then it was printed off at the other end, coloured, and then scanned again?)
big bad bri wrote:beano went to glossy bigger paper with issue 2402 30/7/88 & dandy went glossy with issue 2413 20/2/88.I still prefer the old syle newsprint of 70s & 80s & love the smell of em,i wish they would go back to that style
Aha! So it must have been before 1988, then (and, by extension, before colour), but at the same time after 1986. I don't think we're going to narrow it down any further without someone delving into the attic.
Thanks for your help, everyone.