I don't think it was so much that they decided to reflect the kids of the day, but that they gave a creative, inspired artist like Leo Baxendale his head, and, actually despite their earlier instructions and wishes, finally allowed him to do what he wanted - but his own inspirations included Giles cartoons for adults, 1940s cinema cartoons, and things as old as the Marx Brothers - that is, I doubt he ever thought "I must reflect the kids of today."Little Squelchy Thing wrote:The explosion of creativity in The Beano in the 1950s came about as the powers-that-be realised they had to better reflect the kids of the day, but since then the kids of the 1950s have been used as the exact same template for decades thereafter, which I believe did somewhat alienate later generations.
His suits and mortar boards weren't to make the comic, but the adult characters seem archaic, as he understood the need to give the kid characters a perfect foil. He wrote how important it was to get Minnie's dad absolutely right (his choice was a suit, overriding the staff who wanted him to reflect a working man), and, as I mentioned in a recent exchange with Lew, Dennis's dad was also presented as stiff and stuffy, the absolute nemesis of Dennis's exuberance and lack of self control, to give Dennis his comedic raison d'être; i.e. these were timeless templates that could last indefinitely.
I think the "relevance to da kidz of today/should alienate the adults" idea (more of a modern way of thinking, in light of years of punk rock documentaries!), if applied without understanding those concepts, can potentially lead things a little astray ...
But that's not to deny your feelings or experiences. As a kid in the '70s, I found The Beano (which especially seemed cosy and parent-approved) and Dandy far too old fashioned and archaic even then, and much favoured the fresher, more modern and "hip", kid-friendlier seeming (they weren't obsessed with child beating!) IPC titles by far. But did I actually identify with Ad Lad, Joker, Pete (of the Pockets), Cheeky, Kids' Court and Creature Teacher's class? I'm not sure what that would mean.
I think the ideal is still to give inspired, idea-packed, creative people their head (as long as they bear in mind that their target readership is children) and not allow the ideas of the marketing/focus group people to seep in.